Menu Content/Inhalt
BmR Home arrow BmR Reviews arrow Cooling arrow 80-way Thermal Interface Material Performance Test

QNAP Network Storage Appliances

80-way Thermal Interface Material Performance Test E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Cooling
Written by Olin Coles   
Sunday, 14 June 2009
Article Index
80-way Thermal Interface Material Performance Test
80 Thermal Pastes Compared
Surface Preparation
TIM Application Methods
Square-Base Application
Application on HDT Coolers
Thermally Conductive Element Reference
Thermal Testing Methodology
TIM Testing and Scores
D: Poor Enthusiast Performance
C: Fair Enthusiast Performance
B: Good Enthusiast Performance
A: Excellent Enthusiast Performance
Final Thoughts and Conclusion

A: Excellent Performance

No doubt this section will see the most visitor traffic, which is a real injustice to the information we've added throughout the other parts of this article. Regardless, hardcore overclockers and performance enthusiasts will enjoy the guidance our testing will provide them, and the thermal performance results will help them achieve the highest overclock and best stability possible. While I would feel perfectly safe working with any thermal material tested in this article, from the best to worst, my confidence lies within the knowledge of how insignificant TIM is on a properly prepared surface with good contact pressure. One high-profile overclocker (and Gigabyte GO OC 2009 champion) once told me that if the surfaces were lapped and polished as good as possible, and mounting compression was exceptional, then Thermal Interface Material would be an unnecessary component. He was right, because in a perfect condition (which is impossible to achieve) the processor and cooler would have metal-on-metal contact with nothing between them creating resistance. Since that scenario just isn't realistically possible, we have these products to provide excellent enthusiast cooling performance instead.

thernal_interface_material_group1.jpg

In the chart below, Benchmark Reviews has assembled those products receiving an "Enthusiast Grade" of A for excellent thermal conductivity performance compared to the other TIM products in our tests:

Product Name Material Description Viscosity Avg Temp Difference Performance Grade
Zaward HSC-G (0) Aluminum Oxide Low / Thin 38.25°C A-
Thermaltake CL-O0027 TG1 (0) Aluminum Oxide Moderate 38.25°C A-
Evercool Cruise Missle STC-03 (0) Aluminum Oxide Low / Thin 38.25°C A-
Gelid GC-2 TC-GC-02-A (0) Aluminum Oxide Low / Thin 38.20°C A-
Arctic Cooling MX-2 Thermal Compound (0) Aluminum Oxide Low / Thin 38.20°C A-
Coolink Chillaramic (0) Zinc Oxide Grease Low / Thin 38.20°C A-
Innovative Cooling Seven Carat Diamond (6) Carbon/Aluminum Oxide High / Thick 38.20°C A-
OCZ Freeze OCZTFRZTC (0) Aluminum Oxide Moderate 38.10°C A
MG Chemicals 860 Silicone HTC (0) Zinc Oxide Grease Low / Thin 38.10°C A
Zalman ZM-STG2 Super Thermal Grease (0) Aluminum Oxide Moderate 38.05°C A
Cooler Master ThermalFusion 400 RG-TF4-TGU1-GP (0) Aluminum Oxide Moderate 38.00°C A
TIM Consultants T-C Grease 0098 (0) Aluminum Oxide Moderate 37.85°C A
GC Electronics Silcone Z9 10-8108 (0) Zinc Oxide Grease Moderate 37.80°C A
Shin-Etsu MicroSi X-23 7783D (0) Aluminum Oxide High / Thick 37.75°C A
TIM Consultants T-C Grease 0099 (Copper) (0) Copper/Aluminum Oxide Low / Thin 37.70°C A
Tuniq TX-3 (0) Aluminum Oxide Moderate 37.65°C A+
Gelid GC-Extreme (0) Aluminum Oxide Low / Thin 37.65°C A+
Thermaltake Grease A2150 (4) Polysynthetic Silver Low / Thin 37.65°C A+
Arctic Silver 5 Polysynthetic Thermal Compound (4) Polysynthetic Silver Low / Thin 37.55°C A+
Shin-Etsu MicroSi G751 (0) Aluminum Oxide Moderate 37.55°C A+
(Test results by Benchmark Reviews .com)

Each product tested received the curing time recommended (see below), or approximately one hour of thermal cycling prior to testing when no cure time was specified.

  • (0) No Curing Time or Special Application Suggested
  • (1) Antec Formula 5 Application Instructions (no curing time recommended)
  • (2) Arctic Silver II Application Instructions(48-hours minimum curing time recommended)
  • (3) Arctic Silver 3 Application Instructions (up to 200-hours recommended curing time)
  • (4) Arctic Silver 5 Application Instructions (up to 200-hours recommended curing time)
  • (5) Arctic Silver Ceramique Application Instructions (25-hours minimum recommended curing time)
  • (6) IC Seven Carat Diamond Application Instructions (10-minute evaporation time, 2-hour curing recommended)
  • (7) CooLaboratory Liquid Pro Application Instructions (no curing time recommended)
  • Selling the Largest Selection of Thermal Paste Products at FrozenCPU

    Selling the Largest Selection of Thermal Paste Products at FrozenCPU



     
    Search Benchmark Reviews

    BmR Newsletter



    Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookPreview the new Benchmark Reviews 2.0 WebsiteReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter