ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card

Written by Olin Coles

Monday, 22 November 2010

Table of Contents: Page Index
ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card
GeForce GTX 580 Closer Look
GeForce GTX 580 Detailed
Features and Specifications
Video Card Testing Methodology
DX10: 3DMark Vantage
DX10: Crysis Warhead
DX11: Aliens vs Predator
DX11: Battlefield Bad Company 2
DX11: BattleForge
DX11: Lost Planet 2
DX9 SSAO: Mafia II
DX11: Metro 2033
DX11: Tom Clancy's HAWX2
DX11: Unigine Heaven 2.1
ASUS ENGTX580 Overclocking
GeForce GTX 580 Temperatures
VGA Power Consumption
ASUS GeForce GTX 580 Conclusion

Page 6 of 19

DX10: 3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage is a PC benchmark suite designed to test the DirectX10 graphics card performance. FutureMark 3DMark Vantage is the latest addition the 3DMark benchmark series built by FutureMark corporation. Although 3DMark Vantage requires NVIDIA PhysX to be installed for program operation, only the CPU/Physics test relies on this technology.

3DMark Vantage offers benchmark tests focusing on GPU, CPU, and Physics performance. Benchmark Reviews uses the two GPU-specific tests for grading video card performance: Jane Nash and New Calico. These tests isolate graphical performance, and remove processor dependence from the benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage v1.02
- Extreme Settings: (Extreme Quality, 8x Multisample Anti-Aliasing, 16x Anisotropic Filtering, 1:2 Scale)

3DMark Vantage GPU Test: Jane Nash

Of the two GPU tests 3DMark Vantage offers, the Jane Nash performance benchmark is slightly less demanding. In a short video scene the special agent escapes a secret lair by water, nearly losing her shirt in the process. Benchmark Reviews tests this DirectX-10 scene at 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 resolutions, and uses Extreme quality settings with 8x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering. The 1:2 scale is utilized, and is the highest this test allows. By maximizing the processing levels of this test, the scene creates the highest level of graphical demand possible and sorts the strong from the weak.

Jane Nash Extreme Quality Settings

Cost Analysis: Jane Nash (1920x1200)

$242 Radeon HD 6870 1GB costs $10.17 per FPS
$255 GeForce GTX 470 1GB costs $10.99 per FPS
$324 Radeon HD 5870 1GB costs $11.25 per FPS
$437 GeForce GTX 480 1536MB costs $14.97 per FPS
$460 EVGA GTX 460 FTW SLI costs $9.81 per FPS
$484 Radeon HD 6870 CrossFireX costs $10.85 per FPS
$520 ASUS ENGTX580 1536MB costs $13.54 per FPS
$520 ASUS GTX 580 Overclocked costs $11.98 per FPS
$570 Radeon HD 5970 2GB costs $13.26 per FPS

3DMark Vantage GPU Test: New Calico

New Calico is the second GPU test in the 3DMark Vantage test suite. Of the two GPU tests, New Calico is the most demanding. In a short video scene featuring a galactic battleground, there is a massive display of busy objects across the screen. Benchmark Reviews tests this DirectX-10 scene at 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 resolutions, and uses Extreme quality settings with 8x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering. The 1:2 scale is utilized, and is the highest this test allows. Using the highest graphics processing level available allows our test products to separate themselves and stand out (if possible).

New Calico Extreme Quality Settings

Cost Analysis: New Calico (1920x1200)

$242 Radeon HD 6870 1GB costs $13.37 per FPS
$255 GeForce GTX 470 1GB costs $12.94 per FPS
$324 Radeon HD 5870 1GB costs $14.86 per FPS
$437 GeForce GTX 480 1536MB costs $17.27 per FPS
$460 EVGA GTX 460 FTW SLI costs $11.06 per FPS
$484 Radeon HD 6870 CrossFireX costs $13.79 per FPS
$520 ASUS ENGTX580 1536MB costs $15.25 per FPS
$520 ASUS GTX 580 Overclocked costs $13.58 per FPS
$570 Radeon HD 5970 2GB costs $16.72 per FPS

Test Summary: The ASUS GeForce GTX 580 competes on two levels: price point, and GPU performance segment. At the $520 price point, it competes directly against ATI's dual-GPU Radeon HD 5970 and a pair of AMD Radeon HD 6870 video cards combined into CrossFireX or two overclocked GeForce GTX 460's in SLI. In regard to single-GPU competition, the closest video cards would be ATI's Radeon HD 5870 or NVIDIA's own GeForce GTX 480.

3dMark Vantage usually sets the pace for coming events, and through the analysis of these two tests spread over two different resolutions we gain a clear insight into who ranks where on the battlefield. In the Jane Nash tests, the dual-GPU Radeon HD 5970 and CrossFireX Radeon HD 6870's outscore the ASUS GeForce GTX 580, but then in the New Calico tests the ENGTX 580 comes back to outperform or match these same video cards. Comparing the GeForce GTX 580 to the older GTX 480 creates a tremendous performance margin, and even more so against the ATI Radeon HD 5870. Adding a hefty overclock using Voltage Tweak draws out the hiding frames, and gives the ENGTX580 a significant advantage. Our cost analysis indicates a trend among the premium top-end graphics products: better frame rate, and less value.

Graphics Card	EVGA GTX 460 FTW	Radeon HD6870	GeForce GTX470	Radeon HD5870	GeForce GTX480	Radeon HD5970	ASUS ENGTX580
GPU Cores	336	1120	448	1600	480	3200 (1600 per GPU)	512
Core Clock (MHz)	850	900	608	850	700	725	782
Shader Clock (MHz)	1700	N/A	1215	N/A	1401	N/A	1564
Memory Clock (MHz)	1000	1050	837	1200	924	1000	1002
Memory Amount	1024MB GDDR5	1024MB GDDR5	1280MB GDDR5	1024MB GDDR5	1536MB GDDR5	2048MB GDDR5	1536MB GDDR5
Memory Interface	256-bit	256-bit	320-bit	256-bit	384-bit	512-bit (256-bit per GPU)	384-bit

<< Previous Page - Next Page >>

Comments

# RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — Harry 2010-11-22 20:42

What a waste of money to be honest to spend $550 bucks on a card which will be beaten within a few months- this thing is nearly as fast as 6850CF

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — Olin Coles 2010-11-22 22:05

Harry, not everyone wants to buy two 6850's and have no upgrade path a year or two later. So you might reconsider who's wasting money.

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: RE: RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — Harry 2010-11-23 03:14

Olin, in two years time you'll be wanting to change your motherboard as well because the new PCIE interface is already in works. Also there aren't many heavy games around to justify an expensive upgrade. I mean a 5870 can easily handle games for up to two more years. The real upgrade mania comes when there is a game or a multimedia application to justify an upgrade, all these chip manufacturers are going through serious financial issues that's why they bring out newer models even when there isn't any demand.

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: RE: RE: RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — Olin Coles 2010-11-23 14:26

See my reply to Gordon, below.

Using your own example, if someone is to purchase a new motherboard simply for the benefit of a new PCI-E 3.0 specification, which entails a new processor and possibly memory, why wouldn't they also buy the best graphics card now? You can't have it both ways, Harry.

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: RE: RE: RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — Tom 2010-11-24 04:56

Harry, even if the GTX580 is a bit slower than 6850CF and costs a little bit more, there's still the issue of Multi-card configurations CF/SLI being substantially more complicated than single card.
Just take a look inside any ATI/nvidia release notes and you'll see that the vast majority of bugs are in multi-card configurations.
I'm willing to sacrifices 10% performance and pay 10% more for the more simple/compatible option.

Reply | Report Comment

# justify — claydough 2011-01-31 22:21

As an artist dreaming for a next gen 2.0 that can someday match what an "army" of creative types can achieve...
( not only in resolution but in pure/massive imaginary scope )
This attitude is very de-moralizing.
Why even read a graphic card benchmark review if you live for the "status quo"? Just git yerself a console and button mash to that.
The graphic card arms race assures me a future with tesselation, vsm soft shadows, and
global illumination:
##youtube.com/watch?v=Dd8yMPZzWfE&feature=related
none of which is or will be ready for prime time if we don't fan the flames.
The product is coming.

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — David Ramsey 2010-11-22 20:59

Um, be beaten in a few months by what, exactly? And how do you know that whatever upcoming wonder card might beat it will be priced anywhere near it? As a hardware geek who must have the latest and greatest, I welcome whatever ATI can come up with in response. Right now, the GTX580's combination of power, noise, and low temps is unbeatable.

Reply | Report Comment

# super — Trajan Long 2010-11-22 21:15

Crushes AMD's single GPU like roadkill. SLI is unbeatable. Great image quality and CUDA. IN many games 580 minimums are better than 5970. Smoother gameplay all around.

Reply | Report Comment

# Succellus — Franck 2010-11-23 04:12

Great article cover the single card contenders and the SLI that could and can match it.
Its clear its not worth yet buying it unless you dont thrust SLI and you have power consuption/heat issues.
BUT, since SLI is only relevant in few games its a factor to be considered.
Many already rushed to the market to buy the vanilla 580, i suppose many more will go to the premium that are coming.

Reply | Report Comment

# Worth it to do — RealNeil 2010-11-23 09:06

It's worth the money if you have it, and I probably wouldn't over clock it either. It run well enough at stock, and if I want more performance then I'll buy another one of them. I had decided earlier on that I was going to but two GTX460's and put them into SLI for my new PC, but this card is smarter for me, so it's what I'll get.

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — Gordon 2010-11-23 14:00

Harry is making a very simple point that I think you are looking past in defense of being a techy like we all most likely are. The card may be great but the cost is too high and the performance over earlier cards isnt enough to justify spending another 3-5 hundred dollars a couple times a year to stay up to date. Technology moves forward at a quick rate but the improvements are very incremental, not large leaps. For each incremental improvement they pump out a new card and charge top dollar for it and add a higher number to the end of the cards type IE GTX - 260/270/280/290/blah blah blah 460/470/480 blah blah 580. I still own dual 260's and have no problems playing all the new games at an appealing framerate. When DX 11 becomes the absolute standard for games and games demand it then I will upgrade. But why stay ahead of the technology train when the tracks that guide it havent been built yet?

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — Olin Coles 2010-11-23 14:23

This isn't my first high-end video card review. I've been testing top level graphics cards for over four years, and every single time it's the same argument and complaint. It's a stale topic that I've written about at length, which I doubt you or Harry has ever read, so I'll summarize for you: They don't continue to make Ferrari's and Lamborghini's because they're fuel efficient or economic, the make them because people will buy them. To this end, high-end video cards will always have a market. It may not be the majority market which is filled with integrated graphics and casual computer users, and it may not be the mainstream graphics market that spawns from these high-end successes, but it?s a big enough market to continue pushing the envelope.

Additionally, you claim that software doesn't exist to warrant the need for products like the GTX 580, and I believe this to be untrue. Have you ever tried playing Crysis with all the graphical glory it was designed with? How about Metro 2033, Lost Planet 2, or Mafia II? Sure, you can play them with PhysX disabled and AA/AF turned down low, but that's like watching movies in standard definition. The logic of this argument also means that DVD and Blu-ray are unnecessary technologies, and VHS was 'good enough'. Not everybody wants to stand still... some of us enjoy the slow march forward.

Reply | Report Comment

# *THOROUGH* — Zack 2010-11-24 07:06

The last two reviews (the general 580 and this one) were incredibly thorough and useful. The tools used, the descriptions, the overclocked charts, price per FPS per game, etc. were all GREATLY appreciated by this humbled little nerd. Even the comments were knowledgable and delivered in a useful way.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH for this review. I hope you get a raise.

Reply | Report Comment

# Tricky Spot... — BeerGutBarry 2010-11-25 01:54

I love the new GTX 580, but can get the new Gigabyte 480 SOC for a bit cheaper...torn.

Curious to see how far partners can push this card though. The improvements made to the 480 from release to now have been pretty impressive, so wondering if similar gains can be made with the 580, or if this is already pushing the limit (without causing a massive increase in power consumption and removing throttling).

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: Tricky Spot... — Olin Coles 2010-11-25 04:57

If it's a choice between the GTX 580 and GTX 480 SOC, I'd jump on the GTX 580 in an instant.

Reply | Report Comment

# how can i spend 770$ ?? — LASER 2010-11-25 03:26

Right Olin!! yea i dont wanna feel that my card is struggling to play the best game i liked..looking at tesselation video that was just to explain the idea.... coming game might share something which wont feel like u playing a game...so tesselating hardware i decided...

GTX 580 in India is for 770$ !!!
GTX 570 will be at 520$ for me....
i saw ferrari ships for 20$-84$ if u order some merchandise...
So is there any chances i can get that GTX 580 in 550$ here???

Reply | Report Comment

# Great Review — Warren 2010-11-25 12:54

Great review. I bought two of these, thus proving that there are people out there who will buy the very best regardless of cost.

As you rightly mention, Ferrari do not make cars that are the most fuel efficient at 60Mph, they know that there are buyers out there who want the best at any price.

Reply | Report Comment

# To Ferrari or Not Ferrari — Rickard 2010-12-06 02:14

Weird review, mixing crossfire/sli scores with normal setups. Would have been more easily understood if you had had a separate table for cf/sli setups.

Also it would be interesting to see the scores mapped to a dollar/performance index to see where the best gain is to be had.

Further its interesting that the cf/sli scores are slightly different with other reviews where the 580 consistently (well almost) had scored lower than the 5970.

I know many think hey its a dual gpu card but hey it costs less and you can still cf/sli it so I dont really see the point they are trying to make.

Imo Nvidia is on the right track and the 460 and 580 is really good cards but atm they are basically catching up and I am waiting to see what the response from AMD is before I commit to an upgrade.

Reply | Report Comment

# fast new cards? — Laszlo 2010-12-10 08:21

For me, a top card is one which beat the older top dog. But none of the new cards doing this (eg. none of them beat the GTX295's raw power: most of them slower except in 1-2 titles),even if they equipped much faster ram, clocked higher,... I would like to see a GTX295 manufactured with 40nm process, GDDR5 mems, 512bit wide mem bus, clocked as high as the new cards. What would touch it in DX10? So we get new feats (which maybe could be SW rendered too..) but not speed. Like 470 -> 570: most of the 25-27% speed advantage of the 570 gained from higher clock speed and just fragments from any optimization and the one less disabled CUDA or other unit. From another point of view: it's not a coincident that first came the slower 480 (vs. 580), then 470 (crippled) then 580 with more MHz, then 570.. maybe we will see a 680 too if the 40nm process allows more than 1 GHz - as a new, very advanced chip of course (which is internally the same). We getting the same, only the price/crippling ratio changes. We are very far away from ray traced rendering, real physics, real materials, ballistics, etc.

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: fast new cards? — Olin Coles 2010-12-10 08:29

I might be misunderstanding your message, so allow me to seek clarification. Are you saying a GeForce GTX 295 outperforms the GTX 580? Just so that you know, it really doesn't even come close. Here's exhibit A: benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=403

If the Radeon HD 5970 can clear it by 35-40% in Crysis and Heaven, then look at where the GTX 580 sits against the Radeon 5970 on those tests in this article.

Reply | Report Comment

# RE: ASUS ENGTX580 GeForce GTX 580 Video Card — Laszlo 2010-12-10 10:38

Yes I was misunderstable. Clock to clock (same GPU/Mem) the 580 would be slower. Or: the 295 would be much faster, manufactured @ 40nm process and set to same clock speeds with same memory modules. = We don't get what nv can make, we get crippled cards - but with new feats. If the 580 would get the GTX285's 512 bit wide memory bus (the 295 also crippled to 448 bit, and from 32 to 28 ROPs per GPU), and 2048 MB memory, 64 ROPs, etc (as it's double number of transistors dictate), then it would be a real high end (technology wise) card. Now it's a very fast card, that milk the consumers like a cow, then nv needs to 'invent' some of their inventions again and we never get a new generation of cards that 100 or more percent faster than their precedessors. When they made their first(?), the Riva128(?) then there was no other just their best chip, and it was blown away by their next, faster chip. Not by one more feat, but by raw power - in ALL games.
Sadly they make only high end chips these days too, then crippling them down to a price category.
So these new cards are fast but far less than they should be - and they should be 50-100% faster in everything, especially in 'future' games that really use their new feats.

Reply | Report Comment

# Nice review — Thomas 2011-01-15 14:42

Very nice review, well done. Thanks very much! That'll be about it...greetings

Reply | Report Comment

# To Olin Coles — Gordon 2011-01-31 22:59

Olin,

Hey, so to clarify I was only trying to make what Harry was saying a little more clear as I assumed there was some misunderstanding. I agree with you in every way as to what you replied, and I should say that your comparison to Ferrari and Lamroghini was spot on. I am definately in the casual group but not by choice, lol. I would, if i could afford, like to stay up with all the newest hardware as I am a firm believer that your rig is only as strong as its weakest component. My gtx 260's: Do they play even Crysis on appealing settings at a decent enough frame rate? Yes I can push them to relatively high settings and play at about 30 or more FPS. BUUUUUT I want a GTX 580 so I can crank that up just as much as the next guy HAHA. Either way I liked your review and found it very informative.

Reply | Report Comment

Refresh comments list

DX10: 3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage GPU Test: Jane Nash

Jane Nash Extreme Quality Settings

Cost Analysis: Jane Nash (1920x1200)

3DMark Vantage GPU Test: New Calico

New Calico Extreme Quality Settings

Cost Analysis: New Calico (1920x1200)

<< Previous Page - Next Page >>

Comments

Add comment

BmR Newsletter