«

»

MSI Radeon R9 270X GAMING Video Card Review

PAGE INDEX

<< PREVIOUS            NEXT >>

MSI R9 270X GAMING 2GD5 Conclusion

IMPORTANT: Although the rating and final score mentioned in this conclusion are made to be as objective as possible, be advised that every author perceives these factors differently. While we each do our best to ensure that all aspects of the product are considered, there are often times unforeseen market conditions and manufacturer revisions that occur after publication which could render our rating obsolete. Please do not base any purchase solely on this conclusion, as it represents our rating specifically for the product tested which may differ from future versions. Benchmark Reviews begins our conclusion with a short summary for each of the areas that we rate.

My ratings begin with performance, where the $199 MSI Radeon R9 270X GAMING 2GD5 graphics card competes with NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 660 base model (according to AMD) that currently costs $179. While the name is very similar, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GTX 660 TI Boost each have twice as many CUDA cores as the standard GTX 660, and start around $249. This ultimately places the Radeon R9 270X in-between GTX 660 and GTX 660 Ti, at least in terms of price.

In DirectX 11 tests the MSI R9 270X GAMING usually outperformed the GeForce GTX 660 Ti, and easily surpassed the GeForce GTX 580 and AMD Radeon HD 6970 in our benchmarks. Ultra-demanding DX11 games such as Batman: Arkham Asylum produced 79 FPS from this factory-overclocked R9 270X, which outperformed the GTX 660 Ti’s 60 FPS while closing in on the Radeon HD 7950’s generated 87 FPS. Battlefield 3 actually gave the MSI R9 270X GAMING a small 1-FPS lead over the Radeon HD 7950 when Ultra quality settings were used, and got within 4-FPS of GTX 760. Lost Planet 2 played well on all graphics cards when set to high quality with 4x AA, but was a test anomaly that forced the MSI R9 270X GAMING to trail behind the GTX 660 Ti by 15-FPS. In Aliens vs Predator the performance was more competitive, with R9 270X GAMING ahead by 11-FPS over GTX 660 Ti while trailing Radeon HD 7950 by 7-FPS. Metro 2033 is another demanding game that requires high-end graphics to enjoy high quality visual settings, and the MSI R9 270X GAMING used its factory overclock to outpace GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 6-FPS while trailing the 7950 by only 3-FPS.

Synthetic benchmark tools offer an unbiased read on graphics products, allowing video card manufacturers to display their performance without special game optimizations or driver influence. Futuremark’s 3DMark11 benchmark suite strained our high-end graphics cards with only mid-level settings displayed at 720p, allowing the MSI R9 270X GAMING to build a slight lead over the GeForce GTX 660 Ti, and usually enough power to outperform the upper-class Radeon HD 7950. Unigine Heaven 3.0 benchmark tests used maximum settings that tend to crush most products, yet the MSI R9 270X GAMING still beat the GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 5-FPS while matching the Radeon HD 7950.

MSI-R9-270X-GAMING-2GD5-Video-Card-V303-Box

Appearance is a much more subjective matter, especially since this particular rating doesn’t have any quantitative benchmark scores to fall back on. AMD’s Radeon HD series has traditionally used the same recognizable ‘black and red brick’ design over the past few years, which tends to dull consumer appeal. MSI breathes new life into this aging look with their Twin Frozr twin-fan cooler and Gaming Series-branded fan shroud. Unfortunately this modified design exhausts most of the heated air back inside the computer case, which may increase operating temperatures on less-ventilated enclosures. Fashionably good looks could earn points with some consumers, but it’s the card’s low heat output and quiet operation that should leave the biggest impression.

Nobody enjoys returning their video card for service because it usually means going without use of the computer, but thankfully construction is the one area MSI graphics cards continually shine. Thanks to extremely cool operation paired with highly efficient GPU cores, the MSI Radeon R9 270X GAMING 2GD5 consumes less energy while emitting less heat. The card requires two 6-pin PCI-E power connections, which are available on practically every mainstream power supply unit. This series offers support for DirectX 11.2, and comes ready for Ultra-HD 4K screen resolutions. Additionally, consumers can have a high-performance single-GPU solution capable of driving three monitors with AMD HD3D support using the two DL-DVI ports with supplementary DisplayPort outputs.

As of October 2013, the MSI Radeon R9 270X GAMING 2GD5 graphics card hits the retail market for $199 (Amazon / NewEgg). This is $49 less than the GeForce GTX 660 Ti that it outperforms on every benchmark, proving itself worthy of value-seeking mainstream gamers. A three-year product warranty ensures that their money doesn’t go to waste if something breaks.

My conclusion: the MSI Radeon R9 270X GAMING 2GD5 graphics card (model 912-V303-002) runs cool under full load and seems ideal for standalone installation for mainstream gaming, but CrossFire sets are also entirely possible inside larger enclosures with above-average ventilation and cooling. For under $200, you’re getting plenty of bang for the buck.

Pros: Benchmark Reviews Silver Tachometer Award Logo (Small)

+ Outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti
+ DirectX 11.2 ready
+ Supports CrossFireX and DisplayPort output
+ Triple-display and AMD HD3D support
+ Twin Frozr keeps GPU very cool
+ Relatively low power consumption under full load
+ 2GB GDDR5 video RAM
+ UltraHD 4K display support

Cons:

- Heated exhaust is circulated back into enclosure
– Shorter warranty period than others offer

Ratings:

  • Performance: 9.00
  • Appearance: 9.25
  • Construction: 9.50
  • Functionality: 9.00
  • Value: 8.00

Final Score: 8.95 out of 10.

Quality Recognition: Benchmark Reviews Silver Tachometer Award.

COMMENT QUESTION: How much are you willing to spend on a graphics card?

NewEgg.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


SKIP TO PAGE:

<< PREVIOUS            NEXT >>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>