«

»

Toshiba OCZ VX500 SSD Review

PAGE INDEX

<< PREVIOUS            NEXT >>

Toshiba OCZ VX500 SSD Conclusion

IMPORTANT: Although the rating and final score mentioned in this conclusion are made to be as objective as possible, please be advised that every author perceives these factors differently at various points in time. While we each do our best to ensure that all aspects of the product are considered, there are often times unforeseen market conditions and manufacturer changes which occur after publication that could render our rating obsolete. Please do not base any purchase solely on our conclusion, as it represents our product rating specifically for the product tested which may differ from future versions.

When TLC (triple level cell) NAND was introduced, it was immediately delegated to “value” SSD drives, since it had significant performance and endurance deficits compared to the more common (and more expensive) MLC NAND. However, new fabrication processes have improved both the performance and the durability of TLC NAND, and these improvements, combined with more advanced algorithms and TLC-specific SSD controllers, have substantially narrowed the performance gap.

In fact, it’s pretty safe to say that most users would not be able to discern any performance difference between these drives in day to day use. That being the case, why would one buy the 512GB VX500 at almost a 50% premium over the 480GB Trion 150?

ocz_vx500_box

Honestly? Peace of mind more than anything else. Sure, the VX500 racks up some substantial wins, especially when the IOPS get flowing, but typical consumer workloads don’t strain the IOPS of any modern SSD, so this isn’t a metric that’s likely to make a difference. It’s interesting that Toshiba’s official specs for the VX500 quote the same sequential read speed (up to 550MB/s) as the Trion 150, and a slightly slower sustained write speed (up to 515MB/s compared to the Trion’s “Up to” 530MB/s). The distinguishing features are:

  • Endurance: 296 TBW (terabytes written) as opposed to 109TBW.
  • Warranty: 5 years on the VX500 vs. 3 years on the Trion.
  • Software: Acronis True Image license with the VX500, nothing on the Trion 150.

As SSD price/performance ratios continue to converge, it becomes harder to declare a true winner in comparisons like this. By the time the endurance or warranty on the less expensive Trion drive runs out, you’ll probably be able to buy 1TB SSDs for well under $100.

Taken on its own, though, the OCZ VX500 512GB SSD is an excellent drive. Its price comes in at the low end of the 512GB SSD spectrum, and the inclusion of Acronis True Image backup utility enables purchasers to easily migrate their Windows installation to the new drive (a feature of True Image). The drive exceeded Toshiba’s specifications for sequential reads and writes in the ATTO utility, and overall performance was excellent, especially considering how much more money you’ll have to spend to get a drive with noticeably more performance. And to really get noticeably more performance, you’re going to have to move to a PCI-E NvME drive anyway.

As of October 2016 Newegg’s prices for OCZ VX500 are 128GB – $66.50, 256GB – $96.99, 512GB – $154.99, 1TB – $334.99, securing VX500 as a solid state drive with excellent value, especially considering its software bundle. But remember that SSD pricing is very volatile these days, and today’s bargain could be tomorrow’s overpriced tech.

Pros:

Benchmark Reviews Golden Tachometer Award Logo (Small)

+ Metal case, screw-together construction
+ Acronis True Image bundled
+ 5-year warranty

Cons:

– Doesn’t convincingly outperform less expensive drives

Ratings:

  • Performance: 8.75
  • Appearance: 9.00
  • Construction: 9.00
  • Functionality: 9.25
  • Value: 9.25

Final Score: 9.05 out of 10.

Excellence Award: Benchmark Reviews Golden Tachometer Award.

COMMENT QUESTION: Which brand of SSD do you trust most?

NewEgg.com

SKIP TO PAGE:

<< PREVIOUS            NEXT >>

1 comment

  1. PK

    One thing I can say in favor of OCZ SSDs right now is their support has been amazing. I’ve had a few very positive interactions with them that resulted in quick resolutions to the issues I was up against. That being said, I haven’t had any reason to talk to other companies because I haven’t had issues, including Samsung, PNY, Intel, Crucial, and AData.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*