«

»

OCZ RD400 PCIe NVMe SSD Review

PAGE INDEX

<< PREVIOUS            NEXT >>

OCZ RD400 PCIe NVMe SSD Review

By David Ramsey

Manufacturer: Toshiba/OCZ
Product Name: OCZ RD400 NVM Express M.2 Solid State Drive
Part Number: RVD400-M2280-512G-A
UPC: 842024037669
Prices: 128GB – $119.99, 256GB – $174.99, 512GB – $309.99, 1TB – $769.99

Full Disclosure: Toshiba/OCZ provided the product sample used in this article.

OCZ Storage Solutions was acquired by Toshiba, and they’ve been repurposed as Toshiba’s “enthusiast” brand for solid state storage. Prior to the Toshiba acquisition, OCZ’s “RevoDrive” PCIe SSDs used proprietary memory boards with multiple SSD controllers on a PCIe card to achieve large capacities (for the time) and amazing performance at an equally amazing price– in the sense that they were very expensive. These days, better performance can be achieved with a PCIEx4 SSD in the m.2 form factor, mounted on a simple PCIe adapter card (that you don’t have to use if your motherboard has an m.2 slot). Today Benchmark Reviews checks out this modern iteration of a PCIe SSD in the 512GB Toshiba RD400.

toshiba_rd400

Specifications

Capacity 512GB
Interface PCIex4
Protocol NVMe
Form Factor m.2 2280 on PCIe card
Controller Toshiba prioprietary
NAND Toshiba 15nm MLC Flash
TRIM Yes
Max. Read Up to 2600MB/sec
Max. Write Up to 1600MB/sec
Write Endurance 296TB
Warranty 5 years

Solid State vs Hard Disk

Benchmark Reviews has championed SSDs over hard disks for many years, as we feel that even when prices were much higher than they are now, the superior performance was worth it. Now that SSD prices have come down dramatically, there’s little reason for any but the most basic computers to use a spinning hard disk as a primary drive.

However, we’re now in the middle of another transition: within the last 18 months or so, standard SATA SSDs have all run up against what used to be the performance province of only the higher-end drives: the bandwidth limitations of the SATA interface. This means that no matter how fast your SSD is, you’re never going to see more than about 550MB/s transfer rates unless you stripe multiple drives together in RAID 0.

Moving from SATA to PCI Express (PCIe) is the obvious solution, but it required different controllers, and many desktop systems, especially enthusiast systems, simply didn’t have the PCI-E lanes to spare. The introduction of Intel’s Skylake architecture added more PCI-E lanes, and the icing on the cake was the introduction of NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) to supplant the older IDE and AHCI protocols, which were design for spinning hard disks and suffered from efficiency issues with fast SSDs.

The latest crop of PCI-E m.2 SSDs implementing the NVMe protocol promises vast increases in performance. Let’s see how this drive compares.


SKIP TO PAGE:

<< PREVIOUS            NEXT >>

2 comments

  1. AMT

    Could we get a test comparison to load certain games, like load times comparisons to sata ssd?
    example, Star Citizen can have some pretty long load times with SATA SSD, would be nice to know if these drives help out much in these situations etc.

    1. Olin Coles

      While the storage device certainly has a lot to do with load time, the speed and architecture of RAM and CPU are also heavily involved. It would be disingenuous to compare one to another unless the user has the exact same system that we use for testing, which is very unlikely.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*